I
last posted about marriage equality in Australia in August 2011, and things were
looking very promising here at that time.
It has been a year and a half since then, and a lot has happened around
the world. Denmark became the eleventh
country to legalize marriage for same-sex couples. In November 2012, voters in the US states of
Washington, Maine, and Maryland changed the tide when they voted for marriage equality
for the first time in US history, and voters in Minnesota at the same time
rejected an amendment that would have enshrined marriage discrimination into
their state constitution. The Mexican
state of Quintana Roo legalized nuptials for all, as did courts in four of
Brazil’s 26 states and their national capital:
Alagoas, Bahia, Brasilia, Piaui, and Sao Paulo. There were further court victories in the Mexican
state of Oaxaca and activists there seem to have a state-by-state court-based
solution to remedy their inequality.
More recently, marriage equality has passed crucial votes in Uruguay,
England, France, and just over the water in New Zealand. All four of those countries are expected to
have full marriage equality in the coming months. On top of that, there are serious movements
in Ireland, Scotland, Luxembourg, and even Colombia to bring marriage equality
to all. Hell, even Thailand is about to
vote on civil unions and the government of Vietnam is currently looking at that
as well. Holy crap!
Back
in the US, the legislatures of Illinois and Rhode Island each had one chamber
pass marriage equality, and both states appear poised to pass marriage
legislatively in the very near future as Democrats control the other chamber in
both states. A measure is being
introduced in Minnesota this week, Delaware shouldn’t be too far behind, civil
rights campaigners are busy shoring up support to override the fat-ass governor’s
veto in New Jersey, and Colorado should have civil unions by the end of this
month. Hell, same-sex marriage was even
brought up in New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming!
Not that is has any chance in any of those states right now, but it’s at
least being talked about there. Who
would have thunk? Five other states are
looking to overturn the marriage discrimination amendments in their
constitutions in 2014, and both the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and
Proposition 8 cases are scheduled to be argued in front of the Supreme Court in
March, with decisions handed down by June.
It could be horrifying, or the best thing ever. Let’s hopes the justices do what’s right and
strike down both discriminatory laws as all lower courts have done before them.
So,
what about Australia? The governing Labor
Party voted to officially include marriage equality in their party platform in
December 2011. Despite that, Prime
Minister Julia Gillard proposed allowing conscience vote on the issue – so members
of the party can vote against party platform if they want to. With that, it pretty much dashed any hope of
bringing equality to hundreds of thousands of Australians who need it. The leader of the Liberal Party (Australia’s
right-wing party) refuses to allow a conscience vote on the issue despite quite
a few high profile members of his party supporting it. Nevertheless, a marriage equality bill was
brought up in the House of Representatives where it was defeated swiftly – 42 to
98. That’s a ridiculous defeat for a country
where polling suggests 70% of the population is in favour of the change and for
a country where Macklemore’s song “Same Love” about gay rights and marriage
equality – which only scratched the charts in the US, topping out at # 89 –
went all the way to # 1 here down under.
The public want this change, but politicians are playing dirty games and
catering to a few critical swing voters.
Next
up: maybe a state based attempt? Marriage has been regulated federally in
Australia, but legal scholars don’t seem to agree on what would happen should a
state pass a marriage equality law. Tasmania
tried to legislate for marriage equality a few months ago. It passed one house of their Parliament, but
missed out by two votes in the other. It
seems some of their Members of Parliament didn’t want to thrust little Tasmania
into a battle over marriage with the federal government. My state, New South Wales, is the largest
state with the most resources to defend any marriage equality law from the
federal government. The state Parliament
currently has an enquiry out to the public, and it looks like it may come up
for a vote in a few months. Victoria and
South Australia have also had rumblings and it will be interesting to see how
it all plays out. We know it is
inevitable, but just how long will Australia wait and just how far behind other
parts of the world will they fall before the government grows some balls and
takes some action?
Now,
we know that the laws here don’t provide marriage equality for all Australians,
but that doesn’t mean that loving gay and lesbian couples can’t get
married. When civil laws of a country
fail, sometimes there’s a religious law that will back you up. It is surprising that so many people hide
their bigotry behind their religion, but as I’ve experienced it, religion is
one place where you can and should be accepted.
Enter two of my best mates: Elcid
and David.
Late
last month, Elcid and David tied the knot in a religious ceremony and a lavish
reception to rival all other weddings. As
many or most Jews are very liberal, the local synagogue had no issue performing
a religious wedding for the boys (as long as both were Jewish, so Elcid spent
the last who knows how long going through the conversion process.) The synagogue called both grooms up to the
Torah on the Shabbat before the wedding – a religious ceremony called the
aufruf. On the day of the wedding, the
two grooms took their place underneath the chuppah (Jewish wedding canopy) and
Rabbi Ninio united them together as a married couple in the eyes of God.
They
signed the ketubah (Jewish marriage contract) and then they both stomped on
glass – a symbolic Jewish wedding custom) before moving into the reception hall. Of course, we had to hoist the boys up on
chairs and dance the Horah!
Then
there were drinks, food, more drinks, more food, and a crazy photo booth where
Team America shined! (Elcid is also originally from the old country)
Then
I had to give the big speech that I had been panicking over for weeks – and fortunately
it went extremely well (despite me incorporating the word “penis” into the
speech… four times…) And then there was
cake.
Delicious
cake. Made by a friend of theirs. And it had the world’s cutest wedding cake
toppers WHICH MATCHED THE BOYS’ OUTFITS.
See?!?!? Now, I don’t know if they had the cake topper
made that way, or if they picked out their outfits based on the topper that
they found, but it was amazeballs. EVEN
THE KIPPAHS MATCHED! Let me repeat: even the fucking kippahs matched! HOLY AMAZEBALLS!
From
start to finish, the wedding was absolutely perfect – every detail. Except for the length. I wouldn’t have been opposed to another hour
of dancing! At the end, the boys exited
stage left and the rest of us went home full, tired, and slightly tipsy. Or a bit more than slightly tipsy. Perfect night!
So
my question is – especially posed to Prime Minister Gillard – if our synagogue recognizes
this marriage between two loving adults as equal to all other marriages performed
in the eyes of God, why can’t Australia recognize that as well? Why can’t Australia – and all of the other
countries out there – respect our religion and let us decide for ourselves what
is right and what is wrong? Marriage
equality isn’t just a civil rights issue.
It’s also a religious freedom issue.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go make my submission to the New
South Wales marriage equality inquiry.
Different types of religious organizations has different saying about the wearing of kippahs. Rambam Jewish law suggests to wear the kippahs only during the prayer session and wearing it in the other times is just like a custom. Thanks for your great posting.
ReplyDeleteDiscount kippahs